2 जुलाई 2014 को सुप्रीम की ओर से अर्नेश कुमार बनाम बिहार सरकार के मामले फैसला दि�

Thomos lily vs Union of India (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); However, if any sitting member of Parliament or a State Legislature is convicted of

Lakshman Singh Versus State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Now so far as the submission on behalf of the appellants

23. It is submitted by Mr. Srivastava that in both the States, the cases are pending at the evidence stage bey

46. It will be clear from the above discussion that the major jurisdictions of the world have come to terms with&nb

We therefore, consider it appropriate to issue the following requirements to be followed in all cases of arrest or detention till legal provisions are made in that behalf as preventive measures : (

We are, in fact, faced with a situation where contrary to the observations in Joginder Kumar’s case how a police officer has to deal with a scenario of arrest, the trial courts are stated to be

18. In view of the aforesaid discussion, and the anomalies in Section 497, as enumerated in para 11 above, it is declared that : (i) Section 497 is struck down as unconstitutional being violat

Conclusion/Directions: 111) In view of the aforesaid discussion, we hold: (i) Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code, if the information discloses commission of a cogni

केस का नाम: Pramod Kumar & Ors. Versus State of U.P. & Ors. उद्धरण (Citation): 2026 INSC 120 पीठ (Bench): न्यायमूर्ति राजेश